Builder: Stu
Language(s): Rust
Contributes To: CTV Prototypes, Char Community
Work(s/ed) At: ZBD
Earlier than Bitcoin, Stu spent his days working as a Home windows System Administrator and in IT Help. His routine consisted of lengthy boring days of sitting in a chair partaking in monotonous upkeep work, reconfiguring techniques, and resetting passwords for customers who’d forgotten them.
It was the form of job the place an issue occurring that really requires you to interact your consideration in a significant approach is so uncommon an incidence that you just wind up sitting round hoping for one thing like that to occur more often than not.
Stu spent most days simply searching by means of Reddit threads throughout his copious quantities of downtime. However this turned out to not be such a foul situation ultimately, as this was how Stu discovered himself pulled into the Bitcoin house round 2017.
Like many Bitcoiners, or fairly soon-to-be Bitcoiners, again in that interval, Stu acquired sucked into the Preliminary Coin Providing (ICO) and altcoin frenzy of the time. Additionally, like many Bitcoiners round that point, he wound up getting burned financially by some unhealthy investments in random unknown tasks wherein he in all probability shouldn’t have invested within the first place.
Inevitably the gravity of Bitcoin pulled him down the proverbial rabbit gap.
After a couple of years of studying extra deeply about Bitcoin, Stu hit a interval of frenzy and stop his job on the peak of the 2021 bull market to search for alternatives to work within the Bitcoin house. By that point the programming language Rust had develop into extensively utilized in completely different Bitcoin tasks and libraries, so Stu started studying it in order that he may contribute to Bitcoin.
In the direction of the top of 2022, his seek for a job within the house ended when he was employed by Michael Tildwell to work at ZBD, an organization that integrates bitcoin funds into videogames utilizing the Lightning Community.
Working At ZBD
Stu labored DevOps at ZBD, however in his free time he stored working at prototype Rust tasks.
“Most of my facet tasks are associated to what I used to be curious about on the time, as I used to be working at ZBD I began making video games that would use bitcoin,” Stu advised Bitcoin Journal.
To begin, he constructed a multiplayer internet sport, rain.run, primarily based round gamers accumulating lightning bolts for rewards in satoshis, to get extra accustomed to constructing purposes which have to speak to one another over a community. Afterwards he constructed a easy connect4 sport performed over the Nostr protocol.
“[This] was an effective way to learn the way Nostr labored,” mentioned Stu.
“I attended btc++ in Austin in 2024, which was the Script version.” The 4 day convention was probably the most dense discussion board for dialogue round Bitcoin script enhancements and covenants within the final 12 months or so.
“There appeared to be, on the time, some form of consensus growing for covenants on Bitcoin,” recalled Stu.
“This acquired me actually curious about how Bitcoin script labored and [led] me to experimenting with Taproot and Bitcoin scripts…” he added.
“I didn’t actually find yourself with a lot but it surely was an effective way to learn the way scripts labored.”
TABConf, Cost Swimming pools, and CTV
In 2024, Stu attended TABConf, one other developer-focused convention, which is held yearly in Atlanta, Georgia. The conversations in Atlanta additionally revolved closely round covenants.
Like all developer-focused conferences, TABConf placed on a hackathon. Stu selected to construct a project utilizing Discreet Log Contracts (DLCs), which enabled customers to wager on the result of chess matches. It grew to become very apparent to Stu that constructing software program round pre-signing massive numbers of transactions launched lots of complexity for builders.
Discussing this concern, he mentioned: “The reply to this drawback appeared to be CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY (CTV). As I wished to study extra about covenants, CTV appeared like a great place to start out, so I began integrating CTV into my DLC chess challenge. I couldn’t consider how easy it made all the things…”
Stu went on to construct a proof-of-concept prototype of a Cost Pool utilizing CTV. Cost swimming pools are a really primary layer 2 system the place teams of bigger than two share management over a single unspent bitcoin output.
“A method we are able to scale bitcoin for use by everybody, with out utilizing centralized third events, is for customers to share UTXO’s,” he mentioned when requested why he selected to work on a proof-of-concept for a fee pool. “Cost swimming pools are an effective way to do that, particularly alongside different layer 2 options reminiscent of Lightning or Ark.”
Covenants
Covenants have develop into a contentious concern within the dialogue about the place to take Bitcoin going ahead. Each developer has their private opinion on them, and Stu isn’t any exception.
“I feel utilizing covenants to exchange pre-signed transactions alone is an incredible enchancment for builders to construct sooner and safer,” he mentioned. “It removes lots of interactivity and friction for customers, so there’s much less want for them to be on-line or coordinate with different events, which may enhance the consumer expertise by a fantastic deal.”
I requested him if that is what drew him to constructing proof-of-concepts and prototypes utilizing CTV versus different covenant proposals.
“I used to be drawn to CTV as a result of it was so easy to implement within the purposes I wished to construct. As soon as I constructed the fee pool with CTV, I used to be planning on doing the identical for all covenant proposals. I found out learn how to get the very same performance with CAT, but it surely simply took a really very long time to get working, and added far more code. The Bitcoin script was like 50 traces of code, in comparison with CTV with like 3 traces.”
“I’m fairly positive there’s consensus between protocol builders that there isn’t any threat to Bitcoin if we enabled CTV…” he mentioned. “…so the argument now appears to be that the customers don’t need it. However the customers are already utilizing purposes and protocols reminiscent of Lightning and multisig vaults that might be improved by CTV. So…I feel it needs to be the precedence for the following tender fork…”
When requested concerning the present contentious nature of the dialogue round covenants and the following tender fork, and the way the ambiance might be improved, he had this to say:
“Somebody must get Saylor to tweet a sandwich emoji and all the things will likely be good.”
“However critically, I don’t actually know. Perhaps extra in individual occasions the place folks can focus on head to head would assist. It doesn’t appear to be a lot of a technical motive that we aren’t making progress, extra of a political one,” he went on to say in a extra severe tone.
“I feel a number of the hesitance is extra round making any change in any respect to Bitcoin. The explanation it’s so exhausting to vary is an incredible property of Bitcoin, but it surely doesn’t have to increase to tender forks fairly a lot. It causes lots of stress for sure Bitcoin builders, particularly Bitcoin Core maintainers. Everyone seems to be ready on their opinion on the following fork, which appears to make them hesitant on becoming a member of within the dialog in any respect, which makes it exhausting to get consensus on any new change,” he mentioned.
The Future
Stu just lately participated within the Bitcoin Open Supply Software program (BOSS) program by Chaincode Labs, a program designed as a approach for builders new to the Bitcoin ecosystem to chop their enamel and shortly develop a deeper understanding of and expertise with constructing on Bitcoin.
Going ahead Stu goes to contribute to the Char Community, a considerably off the radar effort to construct a brand new bitcoin staking platform led by Jeremy Rubin, the developer who designed and proposed CTV. He plans to proceed engaged on his private facet tasks and contributing to open supply tasks as effectively, with the eventual aim of beginning to contribute to Bitcoin Core itself.
Stu had this to say about Bitcoiners’ priorities going into the long run:
“Our primary focus needs to be on making self custody higher. It actually sucks proper now, and I feel extra Bitcoiners on the whole have to admit that. Backing up 12 phrases does sound easy, but it surely actually isn’t that straightforward, and nobody is doing it.”
