Replace (Aug. 8 at 1:48 am UTC): Lookonchain deleted the X publish that’s the topic of this text after analysts argued the X publish was inaccurate as a lot of the funds had been offered in 2021. A new article covering that latest development can be found here.
A whole bunch of cryptocurrency wallets which have remained inactive for over three years have all of a sudden began shifting massive quantities of Ether (ETH).
In response to onchain analyst Lookonchain, as much as 789,533 ETH was linked to the Plus Token Ponzi scheme and has not been moved since April 2021.
Onchain monitoring revealed the tokens have been related to the “Plus Token Ponzi 2” pockets, which dispersed the ETH to hundreds of smaller wallets in 2020.

Associated: Judge labels 2 obscure altcoins as commodities in $120M Ponzi case
Chinese language authority involvement
In the course of the crackdown, Chinese language authorities seized round $4.2 billion in a number of crypto property, together with the Plus Token rip-off.
The property included 194,775 Bitcoin (BTC), 833,083 ETH, 497 million XRP (XRP), 6 billion Dogecoin (DOGE) and different property reminiscent of Bitcoin Money (BCH), Litecoin (LTC) and USDT (USDT).
Though the mix of seized tokens was value round $4.2 billion in late 2020, the entire funds at the moment are value round $13.5 billion as present asset costs are a lot larger.
Associated: FBI busts $43M crypto and Las Vegas hospitality Ponzi scheme
Implications for the crypto market
The reactivation of those wallets and the potential for a sell-off of the seized funds by the Chinese language authorities may set off panic available in the market, however this has but to be seen.
On the time of writing, ETH’s value was round $2,474, up round 1% on the day, and to date, the ETH outflows from the wallets began at 10:17 am UTC on Aug. 7.

Associated: New York jury convicts two promoters of IcomTech crypto ‘Ponzi’
What defines a Ponzi?
On July 4, an Illinois district choose sided with the USA Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC) in labeling two altcoins as commodities in a crypto Ponzi scheme case.
The Ponzi scheme defrauded its victims by promising “steady returns” of 15% yearly from investments in “digital asset commodities.”
In response to the CFTC, the digital currencies concerned within the case fell “into the identical common class at Bitcoin, on which there’s regulated futures buying and selling.”
Journal: How crypto bots are ruining crypto — including auto memecoin rug pulls